Legal Opinion

In re Piro

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1993No. 93-443PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Having reviewed the record in this proceeding, we agree with the board that Piro has not established by clear and convincing evidence the necessary character and fitness for admission to the practice of law in Ohio. Gov. Bar R. I(11)(C)(6). Accordingly, his applications to register as a candidate for admission to the practice of law and to take the bar examination are disapproved. Piro may reapply to take the February 1994 bar examination and, upon reapplication, shall be subject to full review of his character and fitness.

Applications denied.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Piro v. Franklin TownshipOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In re VanDenBosscheOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In re Application of VanDenBosscheOhio Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API