Legal Opinion

In re Keita

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1995No. 91-1266PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Applicants for admission to the Ohio Bar must establish by clear and convincing evidence that their prior conduct justifies the trust of clients, adversaries, courts and others with respect to the professional duties owed to them. An applicant’s commission or conviction of a crime, failure to provide complete and accurate information concerning his or her past, and abuse of the legal process are factors that must be considered in assessing the sufficiency of the applicant’s character, fitness, and moral qualifications for bar admission. A significant deficiency in the honesty,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re VanDenBosscheOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In re Application of PoignonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In re NerrenOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In re Application of KeitaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re Application of LibrettiOhio Supreme Court · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API