Legal Opinion

Kaye v. Jacobs

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 1932No. Docket No. 738PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The action herein was instituted by plaintiff to recover from defendant Jacobs certain trust funds in the latter’s possession, being the proceeds of a sale of personal property transferred to Jacobs by M. M. Lichtenstein and for the purpose of impressing a lien upon and of subjecting to execution sale certain real estate transferred to defendant Jacobs by the owner, M. M. Lichtenstein. From a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff, defendant Jacobs appeals.

The record presents the following facts: On July 1, 1916, articles of incorporation of the Lichtenstein Company were executed by three…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Wenban Estate, Inc. v. HewlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. McCaffey C. Co., Inc. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Llewellyn Iron Works v. Abbott Kidney Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Hassell v. BungeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bumb v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Brainard v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Grover v. TindallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Calzada v. SinclairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API