Legal Opinion

Grover v. Tindall

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 25, 1966No. Civ. 22792PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.

Plaintiff, who brought this action as the trustee in bankruptcy of Carl W. Rynearson against defendants, Maurice and Alice Tindall, to recover on behalf of Rynearson’s creditors certain goods (or the value thereof) allegedly transferred to defendants by Rynearson in fraud of his creditors, appeals from the judgment in favor of defendants.

The complaint in the instant action, after reciting that Rynearson had been adjudged a bankrupt and that plaintiff was the duly qualified and acting trustee in bankruptcy possessing the rights of any and all of Rynearson’s creditors, alleged that since the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Panopulos v. MaderisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Rich v. State Board of OptometryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Van Allen v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jones v. KvistadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Frank Pisano & Associates v. TaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Jones v. Hawaiian Elec. Co., Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Raleigh Industries of America, Inc. v. TassoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Trinity Tractor Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API