Legal Opinion

Gruber v. . Ewbanks

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 20, 1930PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

There was no error in the denial of defendants’ motion for judgment on the notes described in the complaint. This motion was made for the first time after the action had been dismissed by final judgment, and after said judgment had been affirmed on plaintiff’s appeal, by this Court. The action was not pending, at the time the motion was made in the Superior Court of Henderson County, except for the purpose of ascertaining the damages which defendants had sustained by reason of tbe issuance of tbe restraining orders, and tbe continuance of said orders to tbe final bearing. C. S., 855; Well Co.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Townsend v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. State v. . WadfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Wiggins v. GuthrieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. Wiggins v. . GuthrieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  5. Sydnor Pump & Well Co. v. Rocky Mount Ice Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Pemberton v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Coburn v. Roanoke Land and Timber CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Yellen v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API