Atkins v. Beasley
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.
The threshold question which we must consider, although not argued by the parties in their briefs, is whether an appeal lies from Judge McConnell’s entry of partial summary judgment in plaintiffs’ favor. If this is a fragmentary, and therefore premature, appeal, we must dismiss the appeal ex mero motu. Bailey v. Gooding, 301 N.C. 205, 270 S.E. 2d 431 (1980).
A party has a right to appeal a judgment of a trial court under N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 1-277 and 7A-27 if the judgment is (1) a final order, or (2) an interlocutory order affecting some substantial right claimed by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Tridyn Industries, Inc. v. American Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Bailey v. GoodingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ratchford v. C.C. Mangum Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Sims v. Ritter Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Willis v. City of New BernCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Dalenko v. Peden General Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Adair v. AdairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.