Legal Opinion

Florence Oil & Refining Co. v. The First National Bank

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1906No. 4903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Fremont County. Hon. Morton 8. Bailey, Judge." 'Action by Tbe First National Bank of Canon City against Tbe Florence Oil and Refining Company and Ella L. G-umaer. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

Tbe First National Bank of Canon City, as payee, brought suit against tbe defendants, makers of a promissory note executed at Florence, Colorado, and made payable at tbe First National Bank in tbe *121city of Denver. The answer was a general denial only, containing no affirmative defense. At the trial before the court, without a jury, judgment for the amount of the note and interest was given to plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

The only ground argued for reversal is, that the complaint did not aver, and the evidence did - not show that, before bringing the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Perot v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  2. Thomas v. CareySupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  3. Rohrig v. PearsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  4. Esbensen v. HoverColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Westcott v. PattonColorado Court of Appeals · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rottman v. HevenerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Welles v. Colorado National Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  3. First State Bank v. UtmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Harvey v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  5. Nitro Powder Co. v. KearnsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API