Legal Opinion

Rohrig v. Pearson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1890PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from District CJou/rt of /Scm Jucm Gounty.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

Appellant was the proprietor of a meat market in the town of Silverton, and appellee was a dealer in cattle at or near Durango. Appellant purchased beef for his business from time to time from appellee’s duly authorized agent at Silverton, one Spaulding. Appellant failing to pay for all of the cattle purchased, appellee brought suit in the court below, and recovered a balance of $1,010.65.

There is strong ground for the belief that this appeal from the above-mentioned judgment was taken purely for delay. The alleged error relied on may almost be characterized as frivolous. Counsel…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jordan v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  2. Knights of the Maccabees of the World v. PeltonColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Cruickshank v. LichWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Florence Oil & Refining Co. v. The First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  5. Florence Oil & Refining Co. v. McRaeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API