Westcott v. Patton
Colorado Court of Appeals
Appeal from the District Court of Pueblo County.
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
This was an action on promissory notes by the assignee against the maker, Harriet E. Westcott. The complaint was *545in the usual form, and was unobjectionable. It recited, among other things, that “ before the maturity of said note, for a valuable consideration, said Robert Patton ” (payee) “ sold and assigned the said notes to this plaintiff, who is now the legal and lawful holder and owner thereof.” The answer admitted the execution and delivery of the notes, and that the same were unpaid. It also set up that at the time when ¿aid notes fell due, plaintiff was ready, able and willing to pay…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Horn v. Volcano Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Goodwin v. HolbrookNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Limberg v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
- Curtis v. LathropSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
- Stoker v. CogswellNew York Supreme Court · 1863
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bassett v. Eagle Telecommunications, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1987
- Florence Oil & Refining Co. v. The First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Nisbet v. Siegel-Campion Live Stock Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1912
- Nisbet v. Siegel-Campion Live Stock Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1912