Esbensen v. Hover
Colorado Court of Appeals
Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County,
1Opinion of the CourtThomson, J.
This is an action for goods sold and delivered. The complaint .alleges the sale and delivery, and the value and price of the goods; and avers that no part of such price has been paid. The answer admits the sale, delivery and price, hut denies each and every other allegation of the complaint. The answer also contains a counterclaim for damages, for an excessive levy under a writ of attachment which it alleges was issued in the action. A demurrer to the counterclaim was sustained, and judgment on the pleadings given for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appeals.
There is nothing in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McKyring v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Quin v. . LloydNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Perot v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Frisch v. CalerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Hubler v. PullenIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thompson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
- Salway v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Tuthill v. ShermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Florence Oil & Refining Co. v. The First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Columbia Nat. Bank v. RizerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.