Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Wilkinson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 29, 2002No. Civil Action 01-2093(RMU)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.

GRANTING THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; Denying the Plaintiff’s Contingent Motion to Amend His Complaint

I. INTRODUCTION

The pro se 1 plaintiff, Ronald T. Edwards, brings this Bivens 2 action for damages against three federal judges in their official and individual capacities. The defendants are United States Court of Appeals Judges James H. Wilkinson, III, and Diana G. Motz and United States District Judge Samuel G. Wilson. Mr. Edwards claims that the defendants, sitting as a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harbison v. U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign RelationsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  2. Ellingson Drainage, Inc. v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
  3. Harbour v. University Club of WashingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
  4. Miller v. PurpuraDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
  5. Wenger v. TeeterDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API