Legal Opinion
Harbison v. U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 14, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-1828PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
In a span of less than two months, Plaintiff Paul Renfro Harbison, Jr., a pro se litigant, filed three complaints in this Court against dozens of federal and state officials, government agencies, members of the Judiciary, law firms, and private citizens. One complaint has already been reviewed and disposed of by this Court, and two complaints remain pending. 1 The plaintiffs claims appear to stem from divorce proceedings initiated in 2007 by his alleged wife in Spotsylvania, Virginia Circuit Court, which led to his subsequent indictment for…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Unitronics (1989) (R"G) Ltd. v. GharbDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Unitronics (1989) (R"G) Ltd. v. GharbDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Kideckel v. Foreign Nation of CanadaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Klayman v. PorterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Nabaya v. LauckDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.