Legal Opinion

People v. Jackson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2002No. 91464PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kilbride

In this case, we consider for the first time whether, in a criminal bench trial, the State may present evidence relating to a witness’ polygraph examination “for a limited purpose” if that purpose has not been established prior to the admission of the evidence. We hold that it cannot.

Defendant, Lament Jackson, was indicted in the circuit court of Cook County on several charges, including first degree murder (720 ILCS 5/9 — 1(a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(3) (West 1992)) and attempted armed robbery (720 ILCS 5/8 — 4, 18 — 2 (West 1992)). During defendant’s bench trial, the State elicited polygraph…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. People v. BaynesIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. HamptonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. GardIllinois Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. NaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. A.O.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  4. People v. MooreAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  5. People v. WashingtonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API