Legal Opinion

State v. A.O.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 4, 2009PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rabner

Four hours after learning that police suspected him of raping his girlfriend’s ten-year-old daughter, defendant sought to clear his name by agreeing to take a lie-detector test. Though polygraph evidence is generally inadmissible, defendant, without counsel, signed a stipulation before submitting to the exam in which he not only agreed to take the test but also (1) agreed that the polygraph examiner was an expert at his craft, (2) waived any objection to the admissibility of the expert’s testimony, (3) waived the right to call another expert or witness about that evidence, and (4) agreed that…

2Cases cited84 opinions

  1. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. GouveiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Emmanuel Mervilus v. Union CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
  2. State v. HayesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  3. J.B./l.A./b.M./w.M./r.L. v. New Jersey State Parole Board(077235) (Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
  4. State v. LavoieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  5. State ex rel. P.M.P.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API