Legal Opinion

Bollenbach v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 28, 1946No. 41PublishedCited by 911 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter

The petitioner was convicted of conspiring to violate the National Stolen Property Act. The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit sustained the conviction. 147 F. 2d 199. We brought the case here, 324 U. S. 837, because it was submitted to the jury in a way that raised an important question in the administration of federal criminal justice.

The relevant facts upon which decision must turn are these. Bollenbach, the petitioner, and others were indicted upon two counts: for transporting securities in interstate commerce knowing them to have been stolen (48 Stat. 794, 18 U. S. C. § 415;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Bruno v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Starr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by911 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Simmons v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

906 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API