Easton v. Cressey
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment against him in favor of plaintiff for $1,000, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
The facts found by the court are substantially as follows: On September 7, 1887, the parties made a written agreement, by which the appellant, Cressey, agreed to sell to respondent, Easton, a certain piece of land, upon these terms: Easton was to pay “ one thousand dollars cash deposit,” and on or before November 1, 1887, was to pay $2,500; and was also on said last-named day to execute a mortgage upon the land to Cressey for $3,320; then Cressey was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Drew v. PedlarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Phelps v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by8 opinions
- Major-Blakeney Corp. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Dopp v. RichardsUtah Supreme Court · 1913
- Gaume v. SheetsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Smith v. PostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Mente & Co. v. Fresno Compress & Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.