Legal Opinion

Apthorp v. Detzner

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 23, 2015No. 1D14-3592PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRowe, J.

This cases arises from a constitutional challenge to the qualified blind trust statute. Appellant, James Apthorp, seeks a declaration that the statute violates the requirement of full and public financial disclosure found in Article II, section 8 of the Florida Constitution because it allows public officers to file financial disclosure statements without disclosing the value of individual assets contained within qualified blind trusts. As explained further below, because Apthorp failed to present a justiciable controversy, the trial court erred by exercising its jurisdiction and entering a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Martinez v. ScanlanSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Caufield v. CanteleSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  3. Montgomery v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERV.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Santa Rosa Cty. v. ADMIN. COM'NSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  5. Polk County v. SofkaSupreme Court of Florida · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shawn Ahearn, on behalf of himself and all etc. v. Mayo Clinic, a Florida Corporation Mayo etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Rick Scott, in his official capacity etc. v. Gail FrancatiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. David Rivera v. Florida Commission on EthicsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. Samantha Helfrich, individually and etc. v. City of Jacksonville and the Board of etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. Byrd v. Smart and Safe FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API