Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Scanlan

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 6, 1991No. 77179PublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

582 So.2d 1167 (1991)

Bob MARTINEZ, et al., Appellants, Cross-Appellees,

v.

Mark SCANLAN, et al., Appellees, Cross-Appellants.

No. 77179.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 6, 1991.

Rehearing Denied August 13, 1991.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Mitchell D. Franks, Sp. Counsel and Harry F. Chiles, Kathleen E. Moore and Louis F. Hubener, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tallahassee, for Martinez, Menendez, and Lewis.

Daniel Y. Sumner, Tallahassee, for Gallagher.

Mary Ann Stiles and Rayford H. Taylor of Stiles & Taylor, P.A., Tallahassee, for Associated Industries of Florida.

Stanley James Brainerd, Gen. Counsel,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Trapp v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1999

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API