Legal Opinion

Caufield v. Cantele

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 19, 2002No. SC99-95PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

837 So.2d 371 (2002)

Edward B. CAUFIELD, et al., Petitioners,

v.

Gino CANTELE, et al., Respondents.

No. SC99-95.

Supreme Court of Florida.

December 19, 2002.

Robert Bruce Snow, Brooksville, FL, for Petitioners.

Donald R. Peyton of Peyton Law Firm, P.A., New Port Richey, FL, for Respondents.

Jon H. Anderson and Ralph Artigliere of Anderson & Artigliere, P.A., Lakeland, FL, for Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers, Amicus Curiae.

QUINCE, J.

We have for review the Fifth District Court of Appeal's opinion in Caufield v. Cantele, 745 So.2d 431 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), which certified conflict with Green Tree Vendor…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Pariente; Concurrence · Pariente; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence · Harding.

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Stockman v. DownsSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Xuereb v. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Savoie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  4. Wagner v. Bieley, Wagner & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1972
  5. Telecom Italia, SPA v. Wholesale Telecom Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. Perlow v. Berg-PerlowSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Hardcastle v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  3. Demont v. DemontDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  4. Alhambra Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. AsadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  5. Hinote v. Ford Motor Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API