Samantha Helfrich, individually and etc. v. City of Jacksonville and the Board of etc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING, REHEARING EN BANC, and . , for CERTIFICATION
2Per curiam
We deny appellant’s motions for rehearing, rehearing en banc, and for certification. We withdraw' our earlier opinion, however, and substitute the following opinion in its place.
Samantha Helfrich (“appellant”) has raised two points in her appeal from a summary final judgment entered in favor of the City of Jacksonville and the Board of Trustees of the Jacksonville Retirement System (“appellees,” “the City,” or “the Board”). Upon careful examination of the issues raised, we conclude the first point on appeal is dispositive;…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- May v. HolleySupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- The Florida Bar v. GreeneSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Polk County v. SofkaSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Bryant v. GraySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Aspsoft, Inc. v. WebClayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Kimberly S. Lopez and Peter J. Allsot v. Naseem LatifDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026