Legal Opinion

City of Omaha v. Gsantner

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1956No. 33964PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

As presented here, plaintiff sought an injunction prohibiting defendant from operating a dog kennel on described property. Defendant by answer admitted the operation of the dog kennel and contended that it was a nonconforming and permitted use within the meaning of section 14-406, R. R. S. 1943. Trial was had. The trial court rendered judgment dismissing plaintiff’s petition with prejudice. Plaintiff appeals.

We reverse the judgment of the trial court and rémand the cause with directions to render judgment for plaintiff as prayed.

The property involved is located on Pacific Street and was zoned…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chudnov v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Town of Lincoln v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Howard & Herrin v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Henke v. ZimmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Granier v. ChagnonMontana Supreme Court · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wolf v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Mioduszewski v. Town of SaugusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  3. City of Beatrice v. GoodenkaufNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. SmileyNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Hazzard v. West Goshen Township Board of Adjustment, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API