City of Beatrice v. Goodenkauf
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
The appellants, Wava D. Goodenkauf and Dale D. Goodenkauf, were boarding 120 dogs on their 6.9 acres of real estate at the time of trial. Appellants’ real estate is located outside the corporate limits of Beatrice but within the city’s 2-mile zoning jurisdiction. The property is located in an A-1 Agricultural District as defined by Beatrice Ordinance No. 79-42 § 501 (July 2, 1979). Permitted principal uses in this district include raising of crops, animal husbandry, and single-family dwellings. Accessory uses “normally appurtenant to the permitted uses” are allowed. Commercial kennels are…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sasich v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Beckman v. City of Grand IslandNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Omaha v. GsantnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- Kitrell v. Board of Adjustment of City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
- Ludwig v. MatterNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by8 opinions
- Graff v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- City of Lincoln v. BruceNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Mossman v. City of ColumbusNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Slama v. SlamaNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
- Hochstein v. Cedar Cty. Bd. of AdjustmentNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.