Legal Opinion

Howard & Herrin v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1925PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

A dog, walking slowly south on the fenced track of the railroad company, in broad daylight, meeting and failing to yield the right of way to a heavy northbound passenger train, was struck and killed. The suit was brought to recover $1,000 as his value. He was a foxhound on the scent, and his extraordinary value rests largely on a characteristic exemplified by the manner of his death — he could neither be cajoled nor intimidated to leave the track — was removable only by superior physical force, which in this case he deliberately encountered.

The train was rounding off of a high bank above a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Railroad v. CriderTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
  2. J. W. Kelly & Co. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  3. State v. Cumberland ClubTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Stonega Coke & Coal Co. v. Southern Steel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Harris v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Davis v. BeelerTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State v. AllmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Meader v. Unemployment Compensation Division of the Industrial Accident BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Granier v. ChagnonMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Hodgson v. MauldinDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API