Victor v. Workforce Safety & Insurance
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Linda Victor and Best Pet appeal from a trial court’s judgment affirming an order of Workforce Safety and Insurance (‘WSI”) denying Victor further disability and vocational rehabilitation benefits. We affirm because a reasoning mind could reasonably decide that the weight of the evidence supports WSI’s decision.
I
[¶ 2] On June 24, 1999, Linda Victor was hurt while working as a dog groomer at Best Pet, a Minot animal grooming and boarding business owned by Ronald Roberts, Victor’s father. Victor has worked for Best Pet since 1984, with a one-year absence in 1989.
[¶ 3]…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Tax CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Rojas v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Houn v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
3Cited by16 opinions
- Teigen v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Industrial Contractors, Inc. v. WORKFORCE SAFETY & INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Tverberg v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Ziesch v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Aga v. Worforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.