Legal Opinion

Victor v. Workforce Safety & Insurance

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2006No. 20050384, 20050400PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Linda Victor and Best Pet appeal from a trial court’s judgment affirming an order of Workforce Safety and Insurance (‘WSI”) denying Victor further disability and vocational rehabilitation benefits. We affirm because a reasoning mind could reasonably decide that the weight of the evidence supports WSI’s decision.

I

[¶ 2] On June 24, 1999, Linda Victor was hurt while working as a dog groomer at Best Pet, a Minot animal grooming and boarding business owned by Ronald Roberts, Victor’s father. Victor has worked for Best Pet since 1984, with a one-year absence in 1989.

[¶ 3]…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Amerada Hess Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Tax CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Rojas v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Houn v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Teigen v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Industrial Contractors, Inc. v. WORKFORCE SAFETY & INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Tverberg v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Ziesch v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Aga v. Worforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API