Shotbolt v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Richard Shotbolt appeals from a district court judgment affirming an order by Workforce Safety & Insurance (“WSI”), which denied Shotbolt further disability and vocational rehabilitation benefits and required him to return to work in the same occupation with any employer. Because we conclude a reasoning mind could reasonably conclude from the weight of the evidence that WSI’s vocational rehabilitation plan requiring Shotbolt return to the same occupation with any employer under N.D.C.C. § 65 — 05.1—01(4)(b), was the first appropriate rehabilitation option for Shot-bolt,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bergum v. NORTH DAKOTA WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Thompson v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Swenson v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Barnes v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Paul v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bishop v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Beam v. WSINorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Welch v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- WSI v. KringlieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Zaiser v. JaegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.