Legal Opinion

Shotbolt v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 2010No. 20090120PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Richard Shotbolt appeals from a district court judgment affirming an order by Workforce Safety & Insurance (“WSI”), which denied Shotbolt further disability and vocational rehabilitation benefits and required him to return to work in the same occupation with any employer. Because we conclude a reasoning mind could reasonably conclude from the weight of the evidence that WSI’s vocational rehabilitation plan requiring Shotbolt return to the same occupation with any employer under N.D.C.C. § 65 — 05.1—01(4)(b), was the first appropriate rehabilitation option for Shot-bolt,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bergum v. NORTH DAKOTA WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Thompson v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Swenson v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Barnes v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Paul v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bishop v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Beam v. WSINorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Welch v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. WSI v. KringlieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Zaiser v. JaegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API