Legal Opinion

Miller v. Workforce Safety & Insurance

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 2004No. 20040064PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Palmer Miller appealed from a district court judgment affirming a Workforce Safety and Insurance (“WSI”) order denying him further disability and vocational rehabilitation benefits. We temporarily remand for an evidentiary hearing regarding alleged improper ex parte communications.

I

[¶ 2] In July 1993, Miller suffered a work-related injury to his lower back while employed as a carpenter with Real Builders, Inc., of Minot. The Worker’s Compensation Bureau, now WSI, accepted Miller’s claim and paid associated medical expenses and disability benefits. Between the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Frank Camero v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  2. Camero v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. Lawrence v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Scott v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Sprunk v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. The Sherwin-williams Company Vs. Iowa Department Of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. Rojas v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Beckler v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Houn v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Ringsaker v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API