Miller v. Workforce Safety & Insurance
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Palmer Miller appealed from a district court judgment affirming a Workforce Safety and Insurance (“WSI”) order denying him further disability and vocational rehabilitation benefits. We temporarily remand for an evidentiary hearing regarding alleged improper ex parte communications.
I
[¶ 2] In July 1993, Miller suffered a work-related injury to his lower back while employed as a carpenter with Real Builders, Inc., of Minot. The Worker’s Compensation Bureau, now WSI, accepted Miller’s claim and paid associated medical expenses and disability benefits. Between the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Frank Camero v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Camero v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Lawrence v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Scott v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Sprunk v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- The Sherwin-williams Company Vs. Iowa Department Of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Rojas v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Beckler v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Houn v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Ringsaker v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.