Legal Opinion
Scott v. Sports Authority, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 1, 2017No. 1402658; A159765PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.
Claimant, who has an accepted workers’ compensation claim for a right knee strain, seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that employer did not also accept the compensability of preexisting degenerative conditions of his right knee. We review the board’s order for substantial evidence and legal error, ORS 183.482(8)(a), (c), and conclude that the board did not err. We therefore affirm.
The facts are not disputed. We summarize them as stated in the board’s order and as stipulated by the parties. Claimant injured his right knee at work in June 2013. Employer’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Johnson v. Spectra PhysicsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- SAIF Corp. v. TullCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Columbia Forest Products v. WoolnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shearer's Foods v. HoffnagleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017