Legal Opinion
Barry v. Rodgers
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 19, 1962No. Civ. 25618PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
Defendants Willard K. Rodgers and Rachel L. Rodgers purport to appeal from an order denying their motions to vacate and set aside a default and a default judgment.
Plaintiff brought an action against appellants Rodgers and numerous other defendants for false arrest, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. The ease against the other defendants was disposed of by dismissal and summary judgment, and they are not here involved.
Bach of the appellants, on May 18, 1955, filed a timely answer to the first amended complaint, denying generally all allegations. Prior thereto a demurrer to the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Utz v. AureguyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Reher v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Kimple v. ConwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Glidden v. PackardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Palpar, Inc. v. ThayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Price v. HibbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Ehman v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Webman v. Little Co. of Mary HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Winter v. RiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986