Legal Opinion

Gedvick v. Hill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1952No. Docket 66, Calendar 45,216PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, C. J.

This is a suit for specific performance. Defendants have appealed from the decree in the circuit court granting the relief sought.

Defendants Hill desired to sell their farm home property in Breen township, Dickinson county. Plaintiff Gedvick owns an adjoining farm. The Hills sent word to Gedvick to ascertain if he might be interested in purchasing the Hill farm. He went to the Hill home and was told by them that the price of their property was $2,500; and, as plaintiff testified:

“I said I will pay that. * * * Victor Hill and Ida Hill said that they had to notify Reverend Mykkinen and tell…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gault v. StormontMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Cooper v. PiersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Rosenbaum v. TyszkaMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Borkowski v. KolodziejskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Opdyke Investment v. NORRIS GRAIN COMPANYMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Jim-Bob, Inc v. MehlingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Zurcher v. HerveatMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Randazzo v. KroenkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Kojaian v. ErnstMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API