Legal Opinion

Kojaian v. Ernst

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 1989No. Docket 103518PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right from an order granting summary disposition in favor of defendants after plaintiff’s case in chief in a bench trial. The trial court’s order was apparently based on its finding that any agreement between the parties failed to meet the requirements of the statute of frauds, MCL 566.108; MSA 26.908. We affirm.

This is an action for specific performance brought by plaintiff real estate developer against defendant real property owners after defendants refused to sell approximately five acres of land in Troy which they had owned for more than thirty years. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Opdyke Investment v. NORRIS GRAIN COMPANYMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Scholnick’s Importers-Clothiers, Inc v. LentMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Northern Ins. Co. of NY v. B. Elliott, Ltd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Gedvick v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  5. McNally v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Zurcher v. HerveatMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Stanton v. DachilleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. KELLY-STEHNEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. MacDonald's Industrial Products, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Porth v. GlasoeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Control Room Technologies LLC v. Waypoint Fiber Networks LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API