Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Randazzo v. Kroenke

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1964No. Calendar 18, Docket 49,983PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1ConcurrenceO’Hara, J.

The precise question here involved is the sufficiency of the allegations in a bill of complaint to state an equitable cause of action. The nature of the action is specific performance of an alleged agreement to convey real estate.

In his original bill of complaint plaintiff alleged that on April 14, 1960, he and defendant entered into a certain “agreement and contract in writing” for the sale and conveyance, with marketable title, of certain lands in Macomb county. The agreement he designated exhibit “A” and incorporated it in his bill of complaint:

“April 14, 1960

Deposit Fifty Dollars for two…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Gault v. StormontMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Ogooshevitz v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Brin v. MichalskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Dodge v. BloodMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Mull v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Opdyke Investment v. NORRIS GRAIN COMPANYMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Jim-Bob, Inc v. MehlingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Zurcher v. HerveatMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Domas v. RossiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Klymyshyn v. SzarekMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API