Legal Opinion
Semper v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 27, 2011No. 10-616CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
The plaintiff, Alfredo Semper, filed a complaint, followed by an amended complaint, in the United States Court of Federal Claims. Plaintiff claims that he was wrongfully terminated from his position as a probation officer by his employer, the United States District Court of the Virgin Islands. Plaintiff claims entitlement to back pay under the Back Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5596 (2006), as well as pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3602 (2006) and 18 U.S.C. § 3672 (2006). Plaintiff also seeks reinstatement to his former position as a probation officer and requests unspecified monetary…
2Cases cited100 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alfredo Semper v. Curtis GomezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Wilburn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Frost v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Alkire v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Szuggar v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019