Legal Opinion

McKay v. H. A. Hall & Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 16, 1912No. 1440PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Stephens County Court; W. H. Admire, Judge. Action by H. A. Hall & Co. against G. W. McKay. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROSSER, C:

This is a suit originally brought before Elzey W. Moore, justice of the peace for the town of Comanche, Okla. The case was appealed to the county court of Stephens county. The county court sustained a demurrer to the ■ amended answer of the defendant. The defendant declined to plead further, and there was a judgment for the plaintiff for the amount of the note, and the defendant appeals. The note was given by. C. M. Rutcliff and the defendant, G. W. McKay, to J. T. Morris. J. T. Morris indorsed the note to plaintiff without recourse after maturity. In his amended answer…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Loeb v. LoebSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Richardson v. PennySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  3. Johnson v. Acme Harvesting MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Harris v. . BurwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  5. Vann v. MarburySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clark v. DuncansonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Nellis v. MintonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Stegal v. Union Bank & Federal Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  4. Wisdom v. Guess Drycleaning Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1934
  5. Curlee v. RulandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API