Legal Opinion

Harris v. . Burwell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1871PublishedCited by 21 opinions

This was a money demand tried upon a case agreed before Watts, J. at Spring Term, 1871, of Granville Superior Court. The facts are that on the 4th September, 1866, the déféndants being partners in trade, executed in the partnership name of Burwell & Parham their promissory note for $1,213.51, payable on the 25th December following to P. R. Merryman. On the 1st December, 1866, the payee for value endorsed said note to one T. O. Hughes.

Read the full summary

This was a money demand tried upon a case agreed before Watts, J. at Spring Term, 1871, of Granville Superior Court. The facts are that on the 4th September, 1866, the déféndants being partners in trade, executed in the partnership name of Burwell & Parham their promissory note for $1,213.51, payable on the 25th December following to P. R. Merryman. On the 1st December, 1866, the payee for value endorsed said note to one T. O. Hughes. At the time of said endorsement-the defendants had paid Merryman $329 ; also $83.50 to be credited on said note as of the date of its maturity. On the 20th of…

1Opinion of the Court

Pearson, O. J.

The case presents the question, whether a note assigned after maturity, is subject in tlie hands of the assignee to any set-off or other defence existing at the time of the assignment, against the assignor.

In Neal v. Lea, 64 N. C., 678, it is held, that by the proper construction of C. C. P., sec. 101, no collateral demand against the assignor can be set up against the assignee, and “ that to make it available, the demand must have attached itself to the note in the hands of the assignor; for instance, a payment made to him not entered on the note, or a claim, which the assignor…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Neal v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Francis v. W. J. & J. G. Edwards & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  2. First National Bank of New Windsor v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Harrison v. . BraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  4. La Due v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  5. STANDARD AMUSEMENT COMPANY v. TarkingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API