Legal Opinion
Stegal v. Union Bank & Federal Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided September 20, 1934PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEpes, J.
This is an action brought by Union Bank and Federal Trust Company against Mary Luck Stegal and R. H. Moss to recover from them $900 with interest from October 30, 1930, until paid, and “ten percent thereof as attorney’s fees,” which it claims to be due to it according to the tenor of the below described negotiable note, which it alleges was “negotiated to it as a holder for value a'nd in due course of business” by the Planters Bank of Clarksville, Virginia.
So far as it is here material the note sued upon reads as follows:
“$900 Clarksville, Va., Oct. 30, 1929.
“On demand days after date I…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Herrick v. . WoolvertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. Leonard Watch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- People v. Cal. Safe Deposit & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Ayer v. HutchinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United Overseas Bank v. Veneers, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
- In the Matter of Robert Dale Johnson, Bankrupt. Bruce Goldstein, Successor to S. David Rubenstein, Receiver in Bankruptcy v. McLean BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Dickenson v. CharlesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
- Olsen-Frankman Livestock Marketing Service, Inc. v. Citizens National Bank of Madelia, a Corporation, John Keim, D/B/A John Keim & SonsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd. v. Milbert Importing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.