Commonwealth v. Stampley
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSosman, J.
The Commonwealth appealed from an order allowing the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained during a patfrisk conducted after he was ordered out of a vehicle during a routine traffic stop. In an unpublished memorandum and order pursuant to its rule 1:28, the Appeals Court affirmed the suppression order, concluding that there was no basis for ordering the defendant out of the car. Commonwealth v. Stampley, 52 Mass. App. Ct. 1103 (2001). We granted the Commonwealth’s application for further appellate review. For the following reasons, we reverse the order granting suppression.
*3241.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Commonwealth v. GonsalvesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. MosesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. TorresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FeyenordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. BostockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Commonwealth v. HaskellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. SantosMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. HortonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.