Shapiro v. Ford Motor Company
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES R.. MILLER, Jr., District Judge.
Memorandum Opinion
In count 3 of the complaint in this case, plaintiffs have alleged, among other things, infringement by Ford Motor Company (hereinafter sometimes termed Ford) of United States Letters Patent No. 3,425,645. Defendant Ford has moved to dismiss count 3 on the ground of improper venue.
The applicable venue statute, 28 U.S. C. § 1400(b), provides as follows:
“Any civil action for patent infringement may be brought in the judicial district where the defendant resides, or where the defendant has committed acts of infringement and has a regular and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Schnell v. Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Grantham v. Challenge-Cook Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Industrial Research Corp. v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Lego Sys., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
- Stanley Works v. Globemaster, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1975
- Finance Co. of America v. BankAmerica Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1980
- Budd Co. v. United States Department of TransportationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- A. O. Smith-Inland, Inc. v. Hoeganaes Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.