Legal Opinion
Budd Co. v. United States Department of Transportation
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 13, 1981No. Civ. A. No. 80-4396PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GILES, District Judge.
Plaintiff, The Budd Company (“Budd”) a disappointed bidder on a rail car manufacturing contract in the State of New Jersey seeks injunctive relief and monetary damages against the United States Department of Transportation, Urban Mass Transportation Administration (“UMTA”) and the Administrator, Theodore Lutz, for alleged violation by UMTA of its own grant guidelines. The relevant guidelines were directed to the New Jersey Transit Corporation (“NJTC”), the grantee.
Federal question jurisdiction is alleged under 28 U.S.C. § 1331(a) and a contract claim of less…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Leech v. First Commodity Corp. of BostonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Chadwick v. Arabian American Oil Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- Walker v. Transport of New JerseyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Conaway Enterprises, Inc. v. Dyna Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982