Legal Opinion

Mangini v. Wolfschmidt, Ltd.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 12, 1961No. Civ. 25018PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

This is an appeal from the portions of a judgment which denied relief to plaintiff upon defendant’s breaches and repudiation of future performance of an exclusive dis tributor’s contract for the sale and distribution of defendant’s products in plaintiff’s exclusive territory within the State of California. Some time after the second trial, Joseph E. Seagram and Sons, Inc., a corporation, was substituted in the place of Wolfsohmidt, Limited, a corporation, as the respondent and Joseph E. Seagram and Sons, Inc., a corporation, is now the respondent in this matter.

The second trial with which we…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Long Beach Drug Co. v. United Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Cosper v. Smith & Wesson Arms Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Ellis v. KlaffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Great Western Distillery Products, Inc. v. John A. Wathen Distillery Co.California Supreme Court · 1937

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Boland, Inc. v. Rolf C. Hagen (USA) Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
  2. Bondi v. Jewels by Edwar, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Burgermeister Brewing Corp. v. BowmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Fisher v. ParsonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Zee Medical Distributor Ass'n, Inc. v. Zee MedicalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API