Legal Opinion
Bondi v. Jewels by Edwar, Ltd.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 26, 1968No. Nov. 26, 1968PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRAMPTON, J. pro tem. *
Preliminary Statement
Plaintiff filed his complaint herein on January 13, 1967. The named defendants, on January 26, 1967, filed a general and special demurrer to each cause of action of the complaint and a motion to strike. Upon hearing, the court sustained the ' general demurrer as to each of the three causes of action set forth in the complaint, with 10 days leave to amend. The special demurrers and motion to strike were placed off calendar. On March 20, 1967, plaintiff having failed to amend his complaint, defendants moved for an order dismissing the action pursuant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Blaustein v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Hollywood Motion Picture Equipment Co. v. FurerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Blaustein v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Blaustein v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.New York Supreme Court · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- John M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image v. Bell & HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Lowell v. Mother's Cake & Cookie Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Roth v. RhodesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.