Legal Opinion

Burgermeister Brewing Corp. v. Bowman

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1964No. Civ. 10776PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.

This litigation commenced in 1954. Plaintiff (“Burgermeister”) filed a complaint against defendant (“Bowman”) for $18,027.14 for beer sold and delivered. Bowman’s answer admitted the indebtedness but he cross-complained for damages for Burgermeister’s repudiation (by premature termination) of a beer distributorship contract. A first trial and jury verdict for Bowman on his cross-complaint was appealed by Burgermeister and reversed and remanded for retrial for error in instructions. (San Francisco Brewing Corp. v. Bowman, 52 Cal.2d 607 [343 P.2d 1].) In the first trial Bowman had claimed (1)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Warner v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Mattei v. HopperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  2. Boland, Inc. v. Rolf C. Hagen (USA) Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
  3. Steiner v. ThextonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Frank Brunckhorst Co. v. Coastal Atlantic, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
  5. Phelps Dodge Copper Products Corp. v. Alpha Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API