Burgermeister Brewing Corp. v. Bowman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.
This litigation commenced in 1954. Plaintiff (“Burgermeister”) filed a complaint against defendant (“Bowman”) for $18,027.14 for beer sold and delivered. Bowman’s answer admitted the indebtedness but he cross-complained for damages for Burgermeister’s repudiation (by premature termination) of a beer distributorship contract. A first trial and jury verdict for Bowman on his cross-complaint was appealed by Burgermeister and reversed and remanded for retrial for error in instructions. (San Francisco Brewing Corp. v. Bowman, 52 Cal.2d 607 [343 P.2d 1].) In the first trial Bowman had claimed (1)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Warner v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Mattei v. HopperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Boland, Inc. v. Rolf C. Hagen (USA) Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Steiner v. ThextonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Frank Brunckhorst Co. v. Coastal Atlantic, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
- Phelps Dodge Copper Products Corp. v. Alpha Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.