Legal Opinion

Nodine v. McNerney

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 23, 2005No. 76A05-0406-CV-335PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Following a bench trial, the trial court entered a judgment denying Appellants' Duane and Fredericka Nodine (the "No-dines") and Glen and Coleen Snyder (the "Snyders") (collectively the "Claimants") claim for title to real estate by adverse possession and granting the Appellees-De-fendants' 1 cross-claim for a prescriptive easement over portions of the Nodines' property. Upon appeal, the Claimants present two issues for our review which we reorder and restate as: (1) whether the trial court erred in concluding that they did not acquire title through adverse possession…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Romine v. GagleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Worthley v. BurbanksIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Litzelswope v. MitchellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Ballard v. HarmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Altevogt v. BrandIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Garriott v. PetersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Betty J. Angel v. Kent H. Powelson and Marjorie A. PowelsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Nodine v. McNerneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Pflum v. Wayne County Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API