Legal Opinion

Nodine v. McNerney

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 2005No. 76A05-0406-CV-335PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION UPON PETITION FOR REHEARING

SULLIVAN, Judge.

The Nodines and Snyders ("Claimants") 1 have filed a Petition for Rehearing asserting error in our opinion in Nodine v. McNerney, 833 N.E.2d 57 (Ind.Ct.App. 2005). We held in relevant part that the trial court properly concluded that the Claimants had not established that they had acquired title to the "disputed areas" by adverse possession. Id. at 67. We issue this opinion upon rehearing for the purpose of clarification with regard to the asserted error.

The Claimants contend that our decision was based in part upon an "erroneous assumption…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nodine v. McNerneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Altevogt v. BrandIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Garriott v. PetersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Betty J. Angel v. Kent H. Powelson and Marjorie A. PowelsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Brad A. Altevogt v. Dennis L. BrandIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API