Nodine v. McNerney
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION UPON PETITION FOR REHEARING
SULLIVAN, Judge.
The Nodines and Snyders ("Claimants") 1 have filed a Petition for Rehearing asserting error in our opinion in Nodine v. McNerney, 833 N.E.2d 57 (Ind.Ct.App. 2005). We held in relevant part that the trial court properly concluded that the Claimants had not established that they had acquired title to the "disputed areas" by adverse possession. Id. at 67. We issue this opinion upon rehearing for the purpose of clarification with regard to the asserted error.
The Claimants contend that our decision was based in part upon an "erroneous assumption…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nodine v. McNerneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
3Cited by4 opinions
- Altevogt v. BrandIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Garriott v. PetersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Betty J. Angel v. Kent H. Powelson and Marjorie A. PowelsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Brad A. Altevogt v. Dennis L. BrandIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012