Legal Opinion
Ballard v. Harman
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 17, 2000No. 52A02-0001-CV-40PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge
Appellants-defendants Patsy, Michael and Sandra Ballard (collectively, the Bal-lards) appeal the trial court’s judgment in favor of appellee-plaintiff Dallas Harman with respect to his action against them to quiet title and for damages involving a certain tract of real estate. Specifically, the Ballards assert that: 1) the trial court erred in quieting title to the real property in Harman’s favor because he failed to prove the elements of adverse possession; 2) it was error to award Harman any damages for the replacement of trees that Michael had cut down on the property;…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Selvia v. ReitmeyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Williams v. RogierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Colonial Discount Corp. v. BerkhardtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- North Snow Bay, Inc. v. HamiltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Smith v. GlesingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Romine v. GagleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Prime Mortgage USA, Inc. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Aberdeen Apartments v. Cary Campbell Realty Alliance, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Wysocki v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Earl F. Shields, Larry J. Shields, and Robert L. Shields v. Rodney L. TaylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.