Legal Opinion

McCONKIE v. Nichols

District Court, D. Maine

Decided October 13, 2005No. CIV. 04-91-B-WPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WOODCOCK, District Judge.

Michael S. McConkie filed a § 1983 action against Detective Scott Nichols on the ground that Detective Nichols lied to him during a police interview and extracted a confession, which resulted in a criminal conviction that was later vacated. After this Court affirmed a recommended decision dismissing Mr. McConkie’s amended complaint, Mr. McConkie filed a motion for reconsideration. This Court reaffirms the portion of the…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  2. (PS) Callum v. Austin Capital BankDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. (PS) Conerly v. Kaiser PermanenteDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. (PS) Patterson v. City of VacavilleDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (PS) Singh v. USCISDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API