Legal Opinion
(PS) Singh v. USCIS
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 31, 2020No. 2:18-cv-02929Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VEER B SINGH, No. 2:18-cv-2929 JAM DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 USCIS, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, 15 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff Veer Singh is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, 19 referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 Pending before the undersigned is defendant’s January 23, 2020 motion to dismiss plaintiff’s 21 amended complaint or for a more definitive statement pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6)…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.