Legal Opinion

(PS) Conerly v. Kaiser Permanente

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 7, 2021No. 2:19-cv-02535Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES CONERLY, et al., No. 2:19-cv-2535 JAM DB PS 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 SHARIF TARPIN, et al. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs James Conerly, Marilyn Tillman-Conerly, Carina Conerly, and M.T. are 18 proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with 19 Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are numerous 20 motions, including defendants’ motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 88-95, 99, 109),…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API