Legal Opinion

P.E. v. W.C.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1996No. Civil No. 960063PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

W. C. [Walter]1 appealed from a judgment declaring him to be the natural, father-* of C.J.A. [Carly] and ordering him to pay child support. We hold that Walter, the reputed father, may not use the five-year statute of limitations of N.D.C.C. § 14-17-05(l)(b) as a shield against his claimed parental obligations. We affirm.

P.E. [Pam] is Carly’s natural mother; Pam and S.P.A.M. [Sam] were married in December 1982. They separated in 1984, and were divorced in February 1986 under' a stipulation which stated that “no children have been nor will be born of said marriage.”…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Soentgen v. Quain & Ramstad Clinic, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Matter of Estate of StantonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Diegel v. City of West FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. B.H. v. K.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Larson v. BaerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nelson v. GilletteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hovland v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Opp v. MatzkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. D.E. v. K.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. WolfgramNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API