Opp v. Matzke
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Ruby and Daniel Hoger, the defendants, appealed from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, George Opp, d/b/a Opp Well Drilling & Supplies, (Opp). The trial court found Ethel and Kenneth Matzke, co-defendants, and Ruby Hoger jointly liable for the cost of drilling a water well. The trial court found Daniel Hoger was never properly served, and denied Opp’s summary judgment motion against Daniel. Opp cross appealed, claiming the trial court had jurisdiction over Daniel, based on his co-tenancy with Ruby, and, thus, Daniel was also…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Olson v. FraaseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Binstock v. TschiderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Diegel v. City of West FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Matter of Estate of HillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- A & a Metal Buildings v. I-S, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ritter, Laber & Associates, Inc. v. Koch Oil, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Nelson v. GilletteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Apache Corp. v. MDU Resources Group, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Arndt v. MakiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Orwig v. OrwigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.