Hovland v. City of Grand Forks
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Caroline and Daryl Hovland appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the City of Grand Forks, dismissing the Hov-lands’ claim for injuries Caroline sustained while in-line.skating on a city bike path. We reverse the district court’s decision and hold the City is not immune under North Dakota’s recreational use statute.
[¶ 2] In 1993, Caroline Hovland was injured while in-line skating with her daughter, Carla, and stepson, Derek, on a bike path owned and maintained by the City of Grand. Forks. The bike path was adjacent to the Red River and was somewhat rolling.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kitto v. Minot Park DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Hanson v. Williams CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Matter of Adoption of KASNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Bulman v. Hulstrand Construction Co., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Binstock v. TschiderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Olson v. Bismarck Parks & Recreation DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Gregory v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Leet v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Bronsen v. Dawes CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- Kappenman v. KlipfelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.