Legal Opinion

Hovland v. City of Grand Forks

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1997No. Civil 960269PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Caroline and Daryl Hovland appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the City of Grand Forks, dismissing the Hov-lands’ claim for injuries Caroline sustained while in-line.skating on a city bike path. We reverse the district court’s decision and hold the City is not immune under North Dakota’s recreational use statute.

[¶ 2] In 1993, Caroline Hovland was injured while in-line skating with her daughter, Carla, and stepson, Derek, on a bike path owned and maintained by the City of Grand. Forks. The bike path was adjacent to the Red River and was somewhat rolling.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kitto v. Minot Park DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hanson v. Williams CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Matter of Adoption of KASNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Bulman v. Hulstrand Construction Co., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Binstock v. TschiderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Olson v. Bismarck Parks & Recreation DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Gregory v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Leet v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Bronsen v. Dawes CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Kappenman v. KlipfelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API